Two things were interesting to me.

1. Newspapers don't seem to agree if he is 42 or 43. Can we trust the rest of their reports if they don't get his age right.

2.What a waste of money. The university that gave him the origional PhD is now clearly a fraud so the whole suit seems to be about when Paul knew that his degree was worthless. What a waste of money to spend a week arguing this point. He must have better things to spend thousands of pounds on. If not then I question his values.

Nick in ''sunny'' Southampton