I've moved some of the above posts from an introduction thread for a new member called Ryan

z8000783 wrote:

And now look what you've done! You've got my posts deleted.

Not deleted, just moved

anotherjen1 wrote:

Not deleted, just moved

Er... What is the title of this thread?

John

John, you probably already know this but in case you don't... Jen moved the off-topic posts away from the thread they were disrupting and put them here instead. Nothing has been deleted.

chris_morris wrote:

John, you probably already know this but in case you don't... Jen moved the off-topic posts away from the thread they were disrupting and put them here instead. Nothing has been deleted.

What is the title of this thread?

John

What a delightful thread this is! If the membership requirement is to have been moved or deleted, then I qualify many times over. Heck, sometimes I move my OWN posts, 'cos it's so much fun.

Watch yourself, Humberstone. When you're deleted from the Deleted thread... Well I don't even want to think about it... so I won't.

......

BMcKenna wrote:

What a delightful thread this is! If the membership requirement is to have been moved or deleted, then I qualify many times over. Heck, sometimes I move my OWN posts, 'cos it's so much fun.

Watch yourself, Humberstone. When you're deleted from the Deleted thread... Well I don't even want to think about it... so I won't.

......

I had never been deleted AT ALL up until this morning.

John

Greetings.

If your message has been deleted or moved to the feedback section, please respond. I am interested in speaking with those individuals who honour the spirit...not just the letter of this site. Changing thoughts, changing minds...not denying thoughts, ignoring minds.

I am sorry, but how does the intro to your response even remotely generate respect? Oh, and by the way, I have challenged minds through language; so, in essence, I have addressed NLP in its original spirit. Is this some sort of "splinter group".

z8000783 wrote:

He's the person at the top of the thread you have been posting in.

And now look what you've done! You've got my posts deleted.

John

I apologize for your post being "moved", i.e. deleted. Apparently, we have taken up "valuable space on the site". As though the infinite bounds of the internet cannot accommodate same. Perhaps our opposition is being hidden from others as it appears to "stir up the pot". I have been warned about my conduct. Oh well. In any event, I don't care to engage with those who can only question or say "Yes". I appreciate original ideas.

saracommisara wrote:

I apologize for your post being "moved", i.e. deleted. Apparently, we have taken up "valuable space on the site".

No it was because we intruded on someone else's questions. It was just housekeeping.

You still have an opportunity to say something useful to Ryan in an NLP context, if you wish,or you can continue to piss around here until a moderator gets bored of reading your posts.

John

You can lead a fool to wisdom but you can't make them think

z8000783 wrote:

No it was because we intruded on someone else's questions. It was just housekeeping.

You still have an opportunity to say something useful to Ryan in an NLP context, if you wish,or you can continue to piss around here until a moderator gets bored of reading your posts.

John

You can lead a fool to wisdom but you can't make them think

I appreciate your attempts to redeem yourself from the position of deleted threads. However, I offended from the get go and so have always been casted here. It takes about 2 seconds for any post of mine to be deleted. I did not mean for you to accompany me here if you truly wish to engage with others. Though, I have read some other posts and do not see where the "NLP" connection fits in, and yet they are still safe. I guess it's because I responded directly to the moderator.

saracommisara wrote:

I appreciate your attempts to redeem yourself from the position of deleted threads. However, I offended from the get go and so have always been casted here. It takes about 2 seconds for any post of mine to be deleted. I did not mean for you to accompany me here if you truly wish to engage with others. Though, I have read some other posts and do not see where the "NLP" connection fits in, and yet they are still safe. I guess it's because I responded directly to the moderator.

No, it was because you did it in someone else's thread.

I have no need to redeem myself from anything.

John

Facts are stubborn things; whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.

z8000783 wrote:

No, it was because you did it in someone else's thread.

I have no need to redeem myself from anything.

John

Facts are stubborn things; whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.

I did not realize that threads were proprietory. If someone commences a thread with the view to allowing others to respond, is this still technically "their thread"?

saracommisara wrote:

I did not realize that threads were proprietory. If someone commences a thread with the view to allowing others to respond, is this still technically "their thread"?

No but if threads go wildly off topic then they become confusing.

Also if a thread is started by someone asking a question then I don't consider it to be polite for someone to then derail it. I wouldn't like it to happen to me.

Do you talk over people and change the topic of conversation when you are with them in person?

John

When you're up to your neck in shit the only thing left to do is sing

z8000783 wrote:

No but if threads go wildly off topic then they become confusing.

Also if a thread is started by someone asking a question then I don't consider it to be polite for someone to then derail it. I wouldn't like it to happen to me.

Do you talk over people and change the topic of conversation when you are with them in person?

John

When you're up to your neck in shit the only thing left to do is sing

On point, the thread I responded to simply stated who was on the thread and purported to speak about "Family Constellations". When I interjected a somewhat controversial view I was reprimanded. I directly answered questions...not even really wanting to engage in the site at all. But since someone asked me for an example, I responded. It would be rude not to respond. Oh, and yes, I have been guilty of speaking over others at some point.

saracommisara wrote:

On point, the thread I responded to simply stated who was on the thread and purported to speak about "Family Constellations". When I interjected a somewhat controversial view I was reprimanded. I directly answered questions...not even really wanting to engage in the site at all. But since someone asked me for an example, I responded. It would be rude not to respond. Oh, and yes, I have been guilty of speaking over others at some point.

Sometimes life is shit so move on.

John

I don't think that I would submit that life is shit simply because some site I happened upon has generated such negativity...Although I don't assume that was the premise upon which this site was created. Anyway, thank you for your responses. I have asked that my account be closed.

saracommisara wrote:

I don't think that I would submit that life is shit simply because some site I happened upon has generated such negativity...Although I don't assume that was the premise upon which this site was created. Anyway, thank you for your responses. I have asked that my account be closed.

I said "sometimes".

Nice talking to you, hope you achieve what you want in the future.

John

Is this another Nick Kemp character?