I would say it looks promising.
As a standalone product it seems to have a lot of value on its own, so if you wanted to you could make it acceptable to even neuroscientists and the skeptically oriented.
If you remove the NLP elements, and just focus on presenting the brainbox with reference to the most relevant aspects of neuropsychology, then you would not be vulnerable to accusations of pseudoscience.
Any reference to left/right brain specialization (dichotomania), anything to do with sense preferences, or any other element that has had pseudoscience attached can be removed. You still have a lot standing, including simple and practical empirically supported methods of reducing arousal etc.
Or alternatively, you could even present the above as examples of pseudoscience to avoid or mind myths to debunk, and that would be a useful activity within the nursing and medical fields.
You'd certainly get applause from the medical researchers.
Here's a good source, and if you get past the accusations of pseudoscience, its actually a positive book from a human improvement point of view:
Mind-Myths-Exploring-Popular-Assumptions [
Amazon UK |
Amazon US]
With a bit of diligent decision making, you could make this product as tight as a drum and as convincing as a Susan Greenfield lecture.
Rich