Hey Peter,

chikimonki wrote:

it's actually great to see you activate some latent part of your brain

How do you know it was 'latent', exactly?

let's see how long you'll be living within the confines of 26 letters, and the orderly structure you've inherited, from now on.

Sorry dude, I really have no idea what that means ...

Taking the piss out of yourself should be done regularly and is one of the most fun things you can do, in my opinion.

Have you read the illuminatus trilogy, by any chance? I think you'd like it. Or you might not - who knows. But it's entertaining, makes use of language in some creative ways, and has some relevance to the kind of thing that has been going on in this thread. And it's really good. RAW rocks.

Cheers,

James T

chikimonki wrote:

Dear Bridget, so...your point is?...

If anything in particular seems unclear to you about my opinions as I stated them above, I'll restate it in different words upon request.

chikimonki wrote:

...Wherever you encountered this delusional chap who warns people of beings that live under the ground is your business...

And wherever you encounted this delusional chap who warns people of the secret messages hidden in the English alphabet and the ability of YouTube to screw with his computer is yours. So... your point is...?

chikimonki wrote:

...I'm working out what you've said above and it adds up to a lot of cliches, as does James t's...

Since you haven't elaborated on what you consider to be cliche in our posts, I'm perfectly willing to take your word for that. Opinions differ; yours and mine on this subject differ wildly. To paraphrase the immortal words of Jules Winnfield, our maps ain't in the same atlas. They ain't on the same shelf; they ain't even in the same fuckin' library.

chikimonki wrote:

...You have obviously read much of the language of law and are familiar with legalese and the FACT it uses english words with different meanings, check out Black's or the Oxford law dictionary, it ain't so wacky.

I have checked out both those books at various times, and if the thing you're claiming "ain't so wacky" is yer man's claims about a secret alphabet code known only to an enlightened few and YouTube sabotaging his software, I don't know how a law dictionary can convince me otherwise.

chikimonki wrote:

...Oh, and it ain't WTF you should be saying as IMF, cos that's who owns your bond, obviously you know all about that, right?

Nope.

Of course that's just what I think.

BMcKenna wrote:

To paraphrase the immortal words of Jules Winnfield, our maps ain't in the same atlas. They ain't on the same shelf; they ain't even in the same fuckin' library.

Ah Bridget - you are truly a woman after my own heart!

james_t wrote:

Ah Bridget - you are truly a woman after my own heart!

That quote's especially for you, James.

James t wrote

How do you know it was latent, exactly?

Well, you'd never done it before, so it's the first time in history that you put such concepts together in space and time, unless I'm mistaken, but I doubt it, why does doubt have a b in it?

James t wrote

Sorry dude, I have no idea what that means

You really don't know? It means have you ever sculpted a sentence/s from yourself, more from what you 'perceive' rather than actually using old concepts, like a smiley, that has letters, but it can represent something different depending on it's particular characteristics, does it nod?

Illuminatus trilogy, I skipped through, I'm currently reading:

How I clobbered every bureaucratic cash-conviscatory agency known to man by Mary Croft

you can read that here:

http://www.hackcanada.com/canadian/f...mary_croft.pdf

With lawful excuse by Robert Menard

you can find that here:

With Lawful Excuse Graphic Novel by Robert Menard (Book) in Comics & Graphic Novels

or watch the film of the same name which is very much related to the book, here:

[ame=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6487575410193274157]With Lawful Excuse[/ame]

I'm also reading

Four centuries of banking vol 1 by George Chandler

[ame=http://www.amazon.co.uk/Four-centuries-banking-grasshopper-Liverpool/dp/B0011VDD42]Four centuries of banking, volume 1: the grasshopper and the liver bird, Liverpool and London.: George CHANDLER, With B&W & col.illus.: Amazon.co.uk: Books[/ame]

Bridget wrote

If anything in particular seems unclear to you about my opinions as I stated them above, I'll restate it in different words upon request.

It's not that anything is unclear for me, quite the reverse.

B wrote

And wherever you encounted this delusional chap who warns people of the secret messages hidden in the English alphabet and the ability of YouTube to screw with his computer is yours. So... your point is...?

Who said anything about secret?

Bridget wrote

Since you haven't elaborated on what you consider to be cliche in our posts, I'm perfectly willing to take your word for that. Opinions differ; yours and mine on this subject differ wildly. To paraphrase the immortal words of Jules Winnfield, our maps ain't in the same atlas. They ain't on the same shelf; they ain't even in the same fuckin' library.

Ain't that the cutest ^-^ perhaps you may wander out of the libray hop on a bus take a look around on the way to the train station, catch a train to somewhere, have a look around, see what you can learn, take a tram, go for a bike ride, BUT GET OFF THE FUCKIN SHELF!!!

Bridget wrote

Of course, that's what I think

But I ain't convinced and why do keep refering to eye8one2 as this and that, you've looked at his vids, why don't you contact him, heaven knows, he is human

Who the f**ks Jules Winnfield, sounds like a right pompous twat.

Have a nice day y'all, d'y'hear?

Here's the FKN newz youtube stylee, this will fuck with your nice ideals about life and how to generate nice feelings, aahhhh!

[ame=http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=aInkStW_lHY&feature=email]YouTube - THE MYONIST CONSPIRACY[/ame]

Next up after the break:

Is there a difference between having fun with language and saying something that's worth listening to? Stanley Unwin and Professor Griff discuss Hegemony and Eggy Money in the New Word(l)d Order.

chikimonki wrote:

Who the f**ks Jules Winnfield, sounds like a right pompous twat.

He's the foot fucking MASTER! ...

So it's the first time in history that you put such concepts together in space and time, unless ames t wrote

how do you know it was latent, which is very much related to the book, don't know? it means have you ever sculpted a I have no idea what that means

you really on it's particular characteristics, does it it can represent something different depending sentence/s from yourself, more from what you I'm currently reading:

how I clobbered every I'm mistaken, but I doubt it, why does doubt exactly?

well, you'd never done it before, here:

200 OK

with concepts, like a smiley, that has letters, but man by mary croft

you can read that lawful excuse by robert menard

you can find that here:

with lawful excuse graphic novel 'perceive' rather than actually using old nod?

illuminatus trilogy, I skipped through, bureaucratic cash-conviscatory agency known to video: by robert menard (book) in comics & graphic here:

with lawful excuse
video from google novels

or watch the film of the same name have a b in it?

james t wrote

sorry dude,

CUT-UP OF PETER'S WORDS C/O THE TEXT MIXING DESK

james_t wrote:

He's the foot fucking MASTER! ...

adrian r wrote:

CUT-UP OF PETER'S WORDS C/O THE TEXT MIXING DESK

Well, whaddya know; we actually did see some advanced language concepts in Adrian's post, and they made every bit as much sense as any of tonight's other contributions to our continuing education.

And we had fun, too. Chris was right: this forum is just a whole lot of fun, and you never know where it's comin' from.

Peter, I was paraphrasing a famous film quote, not getting in your face. Peace out.

To all a good night. See you when the world turns the sun my way again. :cool:

Whoever the foot master is, i hope he's a lot of pleasure

Adrian R

yes, you did a good job there of rearranging words that I'd already spent time/effort and intent on organising, so yours is plageurising, mate, and I thought you are a writer. It's true what they say about desperate ambition, hmm maybe, well at least in one case.

So, you're all really interested in hypnosis, yet I can't imagine how that's possible when there is a constant search for language patterns, what the F.

Below the surface lies the deep:

The only sensible response here is regarding the Illuminatus trilogy, which is an old book and much of the work in it is plageurised from the work of this man:

YouTube - Eustace Mullins=

This man has had 20 strokes and is still prepared to take on the Federal govt. of aus

Have fun and learn well, be amazed.

I heard of an induction were the patient was instructed to imagine a staircase..and..as he went down..that stare case.. deeper and deeper
counting each step as he went down, that's right ..all the way doowwnn

Well when he came out the therapist didn't know he'd actually used his own staircase in his mind, so when he descended said staircase at home, he kept ending up in a trance. Therapist gets a phone call, help me I'm stuck in trance in my pyjama's in the middle of the steet.

Now they're treets, those streets, in trance, down that staicase, that may in the future bring him much unexpected luck as he begins to realise, exactly what it is..

We can learn a lot from the Native American people. I'm not sure this is a good example of that, though.

If you're ever in Washington, check out The National Museum of the American Indian. Lots to learn there. And most of it's not in code.

Peter, if you're going to be accusing anyone of plagiarising, you'd better get your facts straight. Where I'm concerned, all I did was put some text of yours into a cut-up machine, an online form of what William Burroughs and Brion Gysin played with some decades back. If I did rob your words, consider Oscar Wilde's rejoinder: 'Talent borrows, genius steals.'

As for Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea, they're too dead to answer your charge that they plagiarised Eustace Mullins: a whole bunch of people believe stuff along those lines. And Shea and Wilson were very much aware that what they were doing was a work of SATIRE -- that is exposing the credulousness of people who believe any old shite, as Mullins seems to.

In their case, it was people who wrote to them when they were editors at Playboy magazine, and the starting point of Illuminatus is a game of 'what if', as in 'what if all this weird shit people are asking about really is true..?'. Belief System = B.S., right? Only, a lot of people who read Illuminati seem to think Shea and Wilson believed the stuff they were writing about, when the whole point was to send up the nature of belief...another case of seeing the finger and not the moon it's pointing to.

Fnord.

I often enjoy believing things just for the heck of it, to see what exactly I can get out of it, but .. ... why? ^^^

Okay, I'll bite... ^^

What does this do for me? ^

As you read up to your initial post, you'll notice you started off first, because you should really listen to me, I have a lot to say, never mind the skills, because I've always found "s" kills the mood, when I'm enjoy traveling to the world of what is rael because eye can see what is lamb and what is sour because it could be against some rules but not yours to in force seek the mean in some guy that should reflect on what might benefit the person they know should not fall into a hole lot of nothing but maybe you can get something out of it.... you know.. the whole.

but really..
Why keep trying to beat a dead horse?

What if there is some kind of mystical language skill, I haven't read anything in any of the posts that would show me how this is something "I had better listen to" I smell burnt toast doctor....

James,

In the spirit of excessive analytics, these anagrams of your name must mean something seriously strange about you:

Mass Koala Jest

Skate Lasso Jam

Ass Jam, Let Soak


Careful... you never know what a name will say about you...

Regards,

- Jonathan

Adrian R wrote:

anyone of plagiarising, you'd better get your facts straight. Where I'm concerned, all I did was put some text of yours

and

As for Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea, they're too dead to answer your charge that they plagiarised Eustace Mullins: a whole bunch of people believe stuff along those lines

Learn the history of Eustace Mullins, it might shock you, probably won't, lol

and

And Shea and Wilson were very much aware that what they were doing was a work of SATIRE

Yeah, in your opinion, I see how your seperated from reality now. You're so quick to recognise the SATIRE aren't you, nod for yes, heh heh.


Adrian R also wrote:

that is exposing the credulousness of people who believe any old shite, as Mullins seems to.


Well, Eustace Mullins drew all of info from the Library of Congress, in Washington DC, he was followed daily by the FBI, do your own research.

Yeah, I'm sure your very correct in saying that RAW was just sending people up, it still doesn't take away the truth of criminal war crimes and much, much more besides away. Adrian you need to scale up by a 1000% really the worlds passing you by mate, do your own research and find hwere exactly your pawn is in this game and have a look up to see whose face you see!

Chris..you make it sound like Native Americans aren't that valid and that a nice littl mauseleum actually gives more of the truth, well I've come into contact with a lot of Native Americans and they see no borders, and have contracts to that effect, they're very much awake and ahead of the game, unlike 99% of the population of the planet.

'But, that's just coincidence, dear, nothing to worry about'
David Icke

David wrote

what might benefit the person

person, who said anything person? I'm talking benefit the human races, not the person. Person is a strawman created as a foreign situs trust fund, and a name in capital letters and soo, so much more, but that ain't you and never will be in a thousand years.

The reason I put you BETTER listen is, you have complete freewill to choose to read this if you want, when that doesn't resonate with you, that ain't my problem, I'm offering info, take it or leave it. BETTER to take it though.

It must be true what Dr. B says about people who do NLP, you know the whole teeth extraction thing?

Ok I'm off to learn how to gain my sovereignty back, gain access to my foreign situs trust and be able to set off debt, which obviously, y'all know so much about in the quest for freemanship. Enjoy the rest of your day, I'll be having a blast, yeah.

Moving the topic from total nutjobs as David Icke back to what this thread is originally about. I am also one of the Lost Causes that fail to recognize the supposedly "superior language patterns" displayed by this native american.

chikimonki wrote:

for example

4 eggs ample is enough for food, chronological ambiguity, no?

fourx am ple(r) not unlike tamplar or templar

The knights templar f(th)ought for a ca(u)se, over many centuries

sent your eyes

for x, x is a cross Jesus died on a cross for our s(ocial) i(nsurance) n(umbers) a fo(e) to the system, at the time, no?

can you f(o)llow or flow?

Are you trying to say that if you just slur enough when talking and act very selectively when reading, taking certain letters out of words, they get ambiguous meanings? Is changing the biblical meaning of the word "sin" into Social Insurance Numbers useful, and in what way?

And just what is sleight of sound and sleight of write?

[

chikimonki wrote:

I find language interesting and I'm more than willing to share my work in progress

I am curious, how many languages do you speak?

PS. Did you guys see the hidden message in the subtitles?

Hi David, as to wether David Icke is a total nutjob, I'll let you condemn another human being

The native American is positioning our position in the geography of time and space and how to follow the law of the earth and not the law of man. I'm sure you often chat about that type of thing when you bump into a neighbour at Waitrose.

The law of man is a language in itself, called legalese, it's a legitimate language, designed to fool, hide and distort, and I'll repeat, it uses english words, with different meanings.

This means that you are then bound, by the language of law, you are bound in legalese and you don't understand it. What can you do other than to be distracted, manipulated and rushed into agreeing that you are at fault, this all stems from banking and the banks relationships with Kings and Queens and the like.

As for sluring, you know what sleight of mouth is, do you nod? Yes, good, then sleight of hand is what a magician may use to create an illusion. Now, I know it's outlandish to think, people who own your cash ie the banks ( you go there and hand it to them) yes, it's so outrageous to think that they would ever lie to you, no never.

Banks are the most honest establishments the world over and, I'd trust them with my life.

They would never start using fancy language in cahoots with the crown, why would they, they don't stand to gain any advantage do they?

No... never, not the banks, I gave them my money already, it'll be fine, if there is a problem it'll just fizzle away, there won't be anyone plotting and scheming to keep the money I gave away and walked away with a piece of paper.

Hmm.. isn't this interesting, all the money in the world is now practically unseen, why is that, oh I never thought of that, any way corrination street is just about to start let me relax and learn about life from the beautiful acting and the on the edge of the seat plots, that I ALWAYS enjoy.

Ask anyone who deals wiyh money on a day to day basis and you may notice a pattern develop, ooh patterns, NLP, where's the connection, I don't get it. That's because you're not supposed to get it your not supposed to be sneaking around in the business of banks.

Where your money is, and most people aren't aware of the trust funds set up in their name, and the governments have access to them funds, you don't, because you don't know what's going on, you're not supposed to, it's NOT your business!

So, sleight of write and sleight of sound are 'new' technologies that I've discovere, have you ever looked at someone's handwriting and it looks odd or some of the letters can seem like different letters?

Well, if you take concious control of that process then you c4n write and pwple canned ezily onderstond id, can you not?

So the sounds are the same, as in the process of perceiving them.

The biblical meaning of SIN and much more besides is that, we as citizens of a Christian country, which has Christian laws. Look if you went to a friends house, you would respect their house rules, and you would expect the same of them, right?

So it's the same with the country, Islamic law, communist countries are non-religious based law countries, that is they're supposed to be, but that's far from the truth. Law is based on religion, it's where the lawmakers got their original ideas to set up law for people to follow.

This is a large topic and far beyond the scope of my studies so far, but if you have a look at this:

Winston Shrout - Solutions In Commerce

ps the subtitles are in Swedish which is a lutherian country, they are very religious and their law is a reflection of that, it doesn't mean to say law is religion, but that it is a REFLECTION.

Have a grandiose day, I slept most of it and got rid of my cold, no wonder I'm not firing on all cylinders.

chikimonki wrote:

Hi David, as to wether David Icke is a total nutjob, I'll let you condemn another human being

Damian, it's Damian. You're the second one here calling me David. :P

chikimonki wrote:

As for sluring, you know what sleight of mouth is, do you nod? Yes, good, then sleight of hand is what a magician may use to create an illusion. Now, I know it's outlandish to think, people who own your cash ie the banks ( you go there and hand it to them) yes, it's so outrageous to think that they would ever lie to you, no never.

So there is a:

1) Sleight of Hand
2) Sleight of Mouth
3) Sleight of Write
4) Sleight of Sound
5) Sleight of Banking

The first two I know there exist atleast one systematic way of learning them. Can you describe and perhaps even teach me how you perform a sleight of write, sleight of sound and sleight of banking?

chikimonki wrote:

Banks are the most honest establishments the world over and, I'd trust them with my life.

Really.. whenever I have to deal with my bank, they make me wish I'd lube up my rear with vaseline beforehand.

chikimonki wrote:

ps the subtitles are in Swedish which is a lutherian country, they are very religious and their law is a reflection of that, it doesn't mean to say law is religion, but that it is a REFLECTION.

I've lived in Sweden for over 25 years, and claiming either Swedes or Sweden is religious is a load of bollocks right there. It's probably the most atheistic country in the western world and the most atheistic people in the world. A study made a few years back revealed that only 20% of the people here believe in a god. If I'm not mistaken only two former USSR-republics scored lower.

I also happen to have studied Swedish law quite extensively and I'm very well aware of its history. Would you care to back up your claims of Swedish religiousity and Swedish law by some data?